Friday, March 21, 2008

Koo-koo-ka-choo, Mr. Richardson. Jesus loves you more than you will know

HAPPY GOOD FRIDAY...(we non-Christians call it Friday)





Richardson Endorses Obama.
He says it's time for Democrats to stop fighting each other (or something).

A cute story from earlier this month.


The Swamp: Bill Richardson's tough call, short of endorsement


Richardson related an anecdote from one of the debates:

He had fielded a question and then, as the next point went to another candidate, leaned toward Obama next to him on the stage and whispered, "'Boy some of these debates are really boring, aren't they?' Or something like that. And he said, 'Oh god, yeah, you're right.' "

As the two were whispering, a question suddenly veered back to Richardson -- who hadn't been paying attention. "I looked at Obama and he says [whispering] 'Katrina. Katrina.' And I go back and say, 'Well, my three-point plan on Katrina is ...'

"Obama could have thrown me under the bus. But he didn't. So I said, 'Thanks, Obama,' and he said, 'Just listen next time.'"




.

Thursday, March 20, 2008

Last time this happened was in 1992. Guess who was the target then.

George (J. Edgar) "W"hoover Bush Buddies Repeat Watergate Maneuvers?




In the New York Times:

State Dept. Punishes Aides for Obama Passport Breach

Statement from Obama campaign:

This is an outrageous breach of security and privacy, even from an Administration that has shown little regard for either over the last eight years. Our government's duty is to protect the private information of the American people, not use it for political purposes. This is a serious matter that merits a complete investigation, and we demand to know who looked at Senator Obama's passport file, for what purpose, and why it took so long for them to reveal this security breach.


More in depth coverage, including quotes from NBC and officials on HuffPo

Are we sure the W doesn't stand for Whoover?

A chap named Jason Linkins over at The Huffington Post put this video up under the title:

BBC report sheds light on Bush "Hoovervilles"



5 out of 6 Fox Talking Heads Agree: We Must Destroy Obama

This was on the Fox.com site 10 minutes ago.
(Along with many anti-Obama stories, at least one of which is an almost verbatim duplication of a WorldNetDaily story. A screen grab from the WorldNetDaily site is after the Faux image...)

And we should not be angry with Hillary for ignoring her committment to boycott Fox-sponsored debates, why?





And below we have some of WorldNetDaily's recent "News" article titles.
(my favorite is the one about some relatively tooth-free fella who says something about doing drugs and having sex with Obama. I mean...Come ON. There is no WAY the guy pictured in the story was EVER even near Obama's league... You just can not GET that high. I'm not posting the pic or even a link here because I don't want to drive any traffic to the site or help this person gain any more fame from this lunacy.)

2008, meet 1928. Are you sure you're not related?


Great Gatsby, Batman!

Wonk Room » Blog Archive » Income Disparity And Wealth Consolidation Show Eerie Resemblances To 1928

New York Times editorial board gets it right


Editorial
Mr. Obama’s Profile in Courage

Published: March 19, 2008
What is evident is that Barack Obama not only cleared the air over a particular controversy — he raised the discussion of race and religion to a higher plane.




(The line between those who will seek out the truth and those who will refuse to look or listen couldn't be more clear)

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

Late Calls Rarely Merit Snap Decisions


So...we can add this to the "ticking-clock scenario" (used to such evil, mass-hypnotic effect by 24 and worshipped by fascists everywhere) as ANOTHER TURD in the steaming pile of crap that the American people have been gleefully ingesting with their sugared-cereal for years (side effects! Piss off! It makes the cereal taste SWEEETER! Or, do you not like sweetened cereal? Hm? HM?!! You know what kind of people don't like sweetened cereal, don't you? That's right...NON-AMERICANS!!!!!)

Will there ever come a day when we can have a reasonable discussion about how stupid, stupid, stupid, frightened and easy to control people become when they let the media tell them what to think?
Will we be able to sit down together without shaming or enraging the people who have not only believed the lies, but been convinced that they came to this belief on their own, and work together to make it even a tiny bit less likely that this same thing will keep happening again and again and again?

Some people believe that torture is sometimes necessary to save lives and that the President has to make decisions affecting the lives of millions of people in the precious seconds after he or she is awakened at 3am, in such haste that no advisors can be consulted, no plans can be drawn up, and there isn't a moment to waste.

When these people understand that these ideas are wrong (not because the people themselves are bad or dumb in any way, but because the information they were given was falsified on purpose...they were lied to and not given the accurate information that would have helped them make the right choice)...when this day comes...how can we help these people find the humility to admit they were wrong?

How can we help them save face so that we can all get on with the business of fixing the problems created by the ones who did the lying and the ones who REPEATED THE LIES endlessly?

Is there something we, the people who know the truth, can do to help our friends and neighbors and loved ones and fellow citizens to focus the shame and anger and frustration they will feel about having believed the lies and the massive surge of energy these feelings will unleash, towards repairing the damage?

Because, if we don't, it's likely that many of these people will use this energy to cling even more tightly to the lies because to let go of them will mean admitting they were mistaken, and we have become a nation of people who are often unwilling or unable to admit the things we have screwed-up.

Tuesday, March 18, 2008

Andrew Sullivan Loves The Speech


(This was a world-class speech. Support whichever candidate you want to, but at least admit that this was an amazing speech. And if you can not admit that...please ask yourself why. mark.)


The Speech
18 Mar 2008 11:32 am
Andrew Sullivan

Alas, I cannot give a more considered response right now as I have to get on the road. But I do want to say that this searing, nuanced, gut-wrenching, loyal, and deeply, deeply Christian speech is the most honest speech on race in America in my adult lifetime. It is a speech we have all been waiting for for a generation. Its ability to embrace both the legitimate fears and resentments of whites and the understandable anger and dashed hopes of many blacks was, in my view, unique in recent American history.

And it was a reflection of faith - deep, hopeful, transcending faith in the promises of the Gospels. And it was about America - its unique promise, its historic purpose, and our duty to take up the burden to perfect this union - today, in our time, in our way.

I have never felt more convinced that this man's candidacy - not this man, his candidacy - and what he can bring us to achieve - is an historic opportunity. This was a testing; and he did not merely pass it by uttering safe bromides. He addressed the intimate, painful love he has for an imperfect and sometimes embittered man. And how that love enables him to see that man's faults and pain as well as his promise. This is what my faith is about. It is what the Gospels are about. This is a candidate who does not merely speak as a Christian. He acts like a Christian.


Bill Clinton once said that everything bad in America can be rectified by what is good in America. He was right - and...

We Are Stirred, Not Shaken




Some of my favorite stuff from the middle, beginning around 6:30

I have already condemned, in unequivocal terms, the statements of Reverend Wright that have caused such controversy. For some, nagging questions remain. Did I know him to be an occasionally fierce critic of American domestic and foreign policy? Of course. Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes. Did I strongly disagree with many of his political views? Absolutely – just as I’m sure many of you have heard remarks from your pastors, priests, or rabbis with which you strongly disagreed.

But the remarks that have caused this recent firestorm weren’t simply controversial. They weren’t simply a religious leader’s effort to speak out against perceived injustice. Instead, they expressed a profoundly distorted view of this country – a view that sees white racism as endemic, and that elevates what is wrong with America above all that we know is right with America; a view that sees the conflicts in the Middle East as rooted primarily in the actions of stalwart allies like Israel, instead of emanating from the perverse and hateful ideologies of radical Islam.

As such, Reverend Wright’s comments were not only wrong but divisive, divisive at a time when we need unity; racially charged at a time when we need to come together to solve a set of monumental problems – two wars, a terrorist threat, a falling economy, a chronic health care crisis and potentially devastating climate change; problems that are neither black or white or Latino or Asian, but rather problems that confront us all.

Given my background, my politics, and my professed values and ideals, there will no doubt be those for whom my statements of condemnation are not enough. Why associate myself with Reverend Wright in the first place, they may ask? Why not join another church? And I confess that if all that I knew of Reverend Wright were the snippets of those sermons that have run in an endless loop on the television and You Tube, or if Trinity United Church of Christ conformed to the caricatures being peddled by some commentators, there is no doubt that I would react in much the same way

But the truth is, that isn’t all that I know of the man. The man I met more than twenty years ago is a man who helped introduce me to my Christian faith, a man who spoke to me about our obligations to love one another; to care for the sick and lift up the poor. He is a man who served his country as a U.S. Marine; who has studied and lectured at some of the finest universities and seminaries in the country, and who for over thirty years led a church that serves the community by doing God’s work here on Earth – by housing the homeless, ministering to the needy, providing day care services and scholarships and prison ministries, and reaching out to those suffering from HIV/AIDS.

In my first book, Dreams From My Father, I described the experience of my first service at Trinity:

“People began to shout, to rise from their seats and clap and cry out, a forceful wind carrying the reverend’s voice up into the rafters….And in that single note – hope! – I heard something else; at the foot of that cross, inside the thousands of churches across the city, I imagined the stories of ordinary black people merging with the stories of David and Goliath, Moses and Pharaoh, the Christians in the lion’s den, Ezekiel’s field of dry bones. Those stories – of survival, and freedom, and hope – became our story, my story; the blood that had spilled was our blood, the tears our tears; until this black church, on this bright day, seemed once more a vessel carrying the story of a people into future generations and into a larger world. Our trials and triumphs became at once unique and universal, black and more than black; in chronicling our journey, the stories and songs gave us a means to reclaim memories tha t we didn’t need to feel shame about…memories that all people might study and cherish – and with which we could start to rebuild.”

That has been my experience at Trinity. Like other predominantly black churches across the country, Trinity embodies the black community in its entirety – the doctor and the welfare mom, the model student and the former gang-banger. Like other black churches, Trinity’s services are full of raucous laughter and sometimes bawdy humor. They are full of dancing, clapping, screaming and shouting that may seem jarring to the untrained ear. The church contains in full the kindness and cruelty, the fierce intelligence and the shocking ignorance, the struggles and successes, the love and yes, the bitterness and bias that make up the black experience in America.

And this helps explain, perhaps, my relationship with Reverend Wright. As imperfect as he may be, he has been like family to me. He strengthened my faith, officiated my wedding, and baptized my children. Not once in my conversations with him have I heard him talk about any ethnic group in derogatory terms, or treat whites with whom he interacted with anything but courtesy and respect. He contains within him the contradictions – the good and the bad – of the community that he has served diligently for so many years.

I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community. I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother – a woman who helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again for me, a woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in this world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street, and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe.

These people are a part of me. And they are a part of America, this country that I love.

Some will see this as an attempt to justify or excuse comments that are simply inexcusable. I can assure you it is not. I suppose the politically safe thing would be to move on from this episode and just hope that it fades into the woodwork. We can dismiss Reverend Wright as a crank or a demagogue, just as some have dismissed Geraldine Ferraro, in the aftermath of her recent statements, as harboring some deep-seated racial bias.

But race is an issue that I believe this nation cannot afford to ignore right now. We would be making the same mistake that Reverend Wright made in his offending sermons about America – to simplify and stereotype and amplify the negative to the point that it distorts reality.

The fact is that the comments that have been made and the issues that have surfaced over the last few weeks reflect the complexities of race in this country that we’ve never really worked through – a part of our union that we have yet to perfect. And if we walk away now, if we simply retreat into our respective corners, we will never be able to come together and solve challenges like health care, or education, or the need to find good jobs for every American.


If you can watch this and not be stirred, inspired, challenged in the best possible way...then I weep for you.


FULL TEXT IS HERE


FULL TEXT is right above this sentence...

Monday, March 17, 2008

Bear Stearns & the 2 dollar bill



HA, HA, HA!
Wall Street points and laughs at the guys who got caught.
Laugh while you can, boys.

Laugh while you can.

And while you're at it, try to get an office on the highest possible floor to make sure you finish the job when you hurl yourself out the window as the the market fall down, go boom.


Sunday, March 16, 2008

What's that you say, Mr. Potter? Bankruptcy is for suckers?





Bear Stearns & the thieving criminals who brought us Sub-Primania!(tm) join forces with the most corrupt administration in the history of the U.S.A. to
save us
Save US
SAVE US!!!!
from panic and depression!


(at least until a Democrat is in office, when what could have been contained when it was nothing more than a nasty case of financial flu mysteriously becomes economic EBOLA and the world watches as we bleed out and die on the emergency room floor.)




NYT article from Gretchen Morgenson today:
RESCUE ME: A FED BAILOUT CROSSES A LINE



one of my favorite bits (from page 2):
"Investors, already mistrusting many corporate and government leaders, were once again assured that nothing was wrong — right up until the very end. So is it any wonder investors react to every market rumor of an impending failure with the certainty that it’s true? In too many cases, the rumors turned out to be true, notwithstanding the attempts at reassurance by executives and policy makers.

Only last Monday, for example, Bear put out a press release saying, “there is absolutely no truth to the rumors of liquidity problems that circulated today in the market.” The next day, Christopher Cox, the chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, said he was comfortable that the major Wall Street firms were resting on satisfactory “capital cushions.”

Three days later, it was bailout time for Bear."


My, grandmother Fed, what big eyes you have!
The better to see us through this slight downturn with, my dear.

My, grandmother Fed, what large pockets you have, and how full they are!
It's candy, I tell ya. The better to reward you with, my dear.

What a set of chompers you got on you, granny.
Those ain't teeth, you dummy; they're pillows. Put your head on 'em and you'll get the best night's sleep you'll ever have. You like sleep, don't ya kid?

Thoughts on Hillary haters and disproportionate responses






The last post was an excerpt from a piece my great friend Robert sent to me. If you haven’t read it, you might want to. It’s called “Hating Hillary: Getting to the bottom of a cultural trend that has seeped into the church.”

I've been struggling with the severe adverse reactions I've been experiencing each time I get a dose of the Hillary Clinton campaign.

BUT, they say correlation does not equal causation and I am aware of the possibility that the headaches, dizziness, nausea, dry mouth, clenched fists, throbbing temple-veins, gritted teeth, labored breathing, and non-specific rage I exhibit whenever the Clinton is administered might very well not be symptoms that are actually brought about by the active ingredients in the Clinton itself any more than a Post Traumatic Stress Disordered freakout is caused by the rude customer service rep or the contemptuous civil servant. The person on the other end of the altercation may activate the rage and frustration and feelings of powerlessness, but they didn't create them, so the reaction often seems to be (and is) way out of proportion with the actual events as they are unfolding.

For example: I am, let's say, 10 years old and my step-father mocks, belittles and abuses me on a regular basis and no adult seems willing to intervene on my behalf. It is unfair, but there is little I can do about it, so I go to school and suck it up as best I can, knowing at the very least, that school is a place where things are more fair than home. So far, so good.

Then at lunch an older kid, a bully from a grade or two ahead of mine, cuts in front of me in the lunch line. I seethe. I tell the adult lunch-monitor, appealing for justice. I am dismissed, ignored, denied the fair play that has allowed me to keep my anger in check. So, I go back to the line, and one thing leads to another, the bully tells me to piss off, shoving me as a warning to shut up and accept the passive ruling of the kids around us who would rather swallow the injustice and eat a bit later than stand up against this kind of behavior and risk reprisals. After I am pushed, in what is, I must admit, a fairly gentle manner, I flip out and react in a way that can best be described as "non-proportional." Perhaps I grab the fabric of the bully's shirt and throw him out of line, or I take a running start and tackle him or, perhaps, I pick up a hard plastic chair with metal legs and I threaten to throw it at him... Or, maybe I just begin to verbally assault him at the top of my lungs, screaming every curse word I have learned in my young life, pouring out what seems like a thirty-year old reservoir of rage, tearing down his family for generations in either direction, threatening bodily harm of the type which we all know I am entirely incapable of inflicting, realizing I am beginning to shriek as the tears literally pour from my eyes and noticing that there is now an ever-widening circle forming around me as I become a sort of reverse emotional whirlpool and the line compresses itself away from me on both sides and in the few seconds before I am hustled away to the office of some poor, lunchless administrator, I realize that nobody in that vast cafetorium would agree that the sky is blue if I were the one to suggest it. When I am finally escorted from the lunch area, it almost comes as a relief, considering my lack of an exit strategy, my inability to end the sketch.

Hillary isn’t the bully. She isn’t even the negligent lunchroom monitor. She might be one of the other kids on the lunch line, I don’t know. I’m not exactly sure where or if she fits into that tale at all. (But I’m pretty sure the recent Republican administrations are the stepfather who has been abusing us for years…) The point (yes, please…what is this point of which you speak?) seems to be that for me, as I suspect it is for many of us, Hillary Clinton and her campaign, to varying degrees, somehow have morphed into symbols of all injustice, timidity, sad compromise, petty nastiness, duplicity, and even evil. This is neither helpful nor accurate and I think, for me, the first step towards defusing this misguided rage is the attempt to remember that, contrary to some of the evidence (real and ridiculous), Hillary is neither a monster nor a witch; she is a human being. And if she is a human being who, like her campaign and her surrogates and many of her supporters, seems to be in a perpetual defensive crouch, I need to take responsibility for my part in that. How to do that…I’ve not yet figured out.

Or maybe Hillary is just that close relative with whom you have a history of fights and reconciliations and each time you find yourselves in a new dispute, you have to deal with the baggage you have accumulated over years of only temporarily resolved conflict. Perhaps, you tell yourself each time you feel a disagreement a-brewin’, this will be the fight that makes her finally see the fundamental flaw in her philosophy and you will finally, finally, be able to bury the hatchet and move forward with a newfound sense of camaraderie and cooperation. Then she opens her mouth and you are buried up to your neck in steamer trunks and you respond by vomiting out a roomful of backpacks and duffel bags and, once again, you find yourselves drowning in a sea of baggage.

This post is FAR too long and if you have read this far, I would like to marry you.

Christianity Today speaks and this Jew listens



Hating Hillary

Getting to the bottom of a cultural trend that has seeped into the church.

A Christianity Today editorial | posted 3/03/2008 09:40AM

(quote from the conclusion of the article)

But when vigorous political discourse turns into bashing of public figures, it perpetuates a great lie: that they are merely the ideologies and symbols attached to them. When a candidate's ideology is mistaken for his or her personhood, it masks a crucial truth: that each person, no matter their political views, bears God's image and matters deeply to him.

While pundits see candidates as punching bags, evangelicals are supposed to see candidates as, well, people. As we ponder how candidates are "fearfully and wonderfully made," we may haltingly come to realize that the most bold and courageous thing we each could do this election season, no matter who we vote for, is this: Love Hillary.