Showing posts with label obama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label obama. Show all posts

Friday, March 28, 2008

Shout into that credibility gap & hear the echo



Photo by Timothy K. Hamilton


Former President of Chicago NOW, Lorna Brett Howard (a very compelling speaker, by the way) on why she switched from supporting Hillary to supporting Obama:

In Iowa, Hillary Clinton was telling people at pro-choice rallies, young women, that Barack Obama was weak on choice when he was a state senator, which is patently false. I was the president of Chicago NOW at the time and I worked closely with him. He had a 100% voting record and 100% with NARAL and Planned Parenthood.

I stayed with Hillary Clinton through that...but a friend forwarded me a piece of direct mail... It attacked Barack Obama on choice and it enraged me.

I'm supporting Barack Obama for president now because not only is he 100% pro-choice, he's 100% honest.
And this line of attack on an issue I care about so deeply is not acceptable to me
.


(In the interest of full disclosure, I must admit that the reason I initially watched this clip is that I thought Lorna was Julia Roberts. I'm still not convinced she isn't.)

Thursday, March 27, 2008

If You See Something, Say Something





Time - Access to Passport File Gets Easier

The expanded access does not appear to be related to the breaches of the candidates' records. But privacy experts are concerned nonetheless


Hmmm...
The Bush admin relaxed the rules for access to passport files on Jan. 9

Jan. 9 is the same day Obama's files were breached for the "first time."

But, I totally believe the pish-poshing of the idea that these two facts are related and even the suggestion of the possibility of institutional involvement in this piffle makes me laugh. Laugh, i say. Hands on hips, bowl full of jelly-belly shimmying, chin to sky, trumpeting Ha-HAAAA!

You people who see dirty deeds done dirt cheap when you look at perfectly innocent mistakes, gaffes, flubs and bloopers...you people make me shake my head, roll my eyes and guffaw. You silly, silly, vigilant, familiar with history people.

Wednesday, March 26, 2008

A Golden Oldie

The Tide Is Turning

From Bob Cesca at The Huffington Post
A nice little video with bits of The Speech


Friday, March 21, 2008

Koo-koo-ka-choo, Mr. Richardson. Jesus loves you more than you will know

HAPPY GOOD FRIDAY...(we non-Christians call it Friday)





Richardson Endorses Obama.
He says it's time for Democrats to stop fighting each other (or something).

A cute story from earlier this month.


The Swamp: Bill Richardson's tough call, short of endorsement


Richardson related an anecdote from one of the debates:

He had fielded a question and then, as the next point went to another candidate, leaned toward Obama next to him on the stage and whispered, "'Boy some of these debates are really boring, aren't they?' Or something like that. And he said, 'Oh god, yeah, you're right.' "

As the two were whispering, a question suddenly veered back to Richardson -- who hadn't been paying attention. "I looked at Obama and he says [whispering] 'Katrina. Katrina.' And I go back and say, 'Well, my three-point plan on Katrina is ...'

"Obama could have thrown me under the bus. But he didn't. So I said, 'Thanks, Obama,' and he said, 'Just listen next time.'"




.

Thursday, March 20, 2008

Last time this happened was in 1992. Guess who was the target then.

George (J. Edgar) "W"hoover Bush Buddies Repeat Watergate Maneuvers?




In the New York Times:

State Dept. Punishes Aides for Obama Passport Breach

Statement from Obama campaign:

This is an outrageous breach of security and privacy, even from an Administration that has shown little regard for either over the last eight years. Our government's duty is to protect the private information of the American people, not use it for political purposes. This is a serious matter that merits a complete investigation, and we demand to know who looked at Senator Obama's passport file, for what purpose, and why it took so long for them to reveal this security breach.


More in depth coverage, including quotes from NBC and officials on HuffPo

Are we sure the W doesn't stand for Whoover?

A chap named Jason Linkins over at The Huffington Post put this video up under the title:

BBC report sheds light on Bush "Hoovervilles"



5 out of 6 Fox Talking Heads Agree: We Must Destroy Obama

This was on the Fox.com site 10 minutes ago.
(Along with many anti-Obama stories, at least one of which is an almost verbatim duplication of a WorldNetDaily story. A screen grab from the WorldNetDaily site is after the Faux image...)

And we should not be angry with Hillary for ignoring her committment to boycott Fox-sponsored debates, why?





And below we have some of WorldNetDaily's recent "News" article titles.
(my favorite is the one about some relatively tooth-free fella who says something about doing drugs and having sex with Obama. I mean...Come ON. There is no WAY the guy pictured in the story was EVER even near Obama's league... You just can not GET that high. I'm not posting the pic or even a link here because I don't want to drive any traffic to the site or help this person gain any more fame from this lunacy.)

New York Times editorial board gets it right


Editorial
Mr. Obama’s Profile in Courage

Published: March 19, 2008
What is evident is that Barack Obama not only cleared the air over a particular controversy — he raised the discussion of race and religion to a higher plane.




(The line between those who will seek out the truth and those who will refuse to look or listen couldn't be more clear)

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

Late Calls Rarely Merit Snap Decisions


So...we can add this to the "ticking-clock scenario" (used to such evil, mass-hypnotic effect by 24 and worshipped by fascists everywhere) as ANOTHER TURD in the steaming pile of crap that the American people have been gleefully ingesting with their sugared-cereal for years (side effects! Piss off! It makes the cereal taste SWEEETER! Or, do you not like sweetened cereal? Hm? HM?!! You know what kind of people don't like sweetened cereal, don't you? That's right...NON-AMERICANS!!!!!)

Will there ever come a day when we can have a reasonable discussion about how stupid, stupid, stupid, frightened and easy to control people become when they let the media tell them what to think?
Will we be able to sit down together without shaming or enraging the people who have not only believed the lies, but been convinced that they came to this belief on their own, and work together to make it even a tiny bit less likely that this same thing will keep happening again and again and again?

Some people believe that torture is sometimes necessary to save lives and that the President has to make decisions affecting the lives of millions of people in the precious seconds after he or she is awakened at 3am, in such haste that no advisors can be consulted, no plans can be drawn up, and there isn't a moment to waste.

When these people understand that these ideas are wrong (not because the people themselves are bad or dumb in any way, but because the information they were given was falsified on purpose...they were lied to and not given the accurate information that would have helped them make the right choice)...when this day comes...how can we help these people find the humility to admit they were wrong?

How can we help them save face so that we can all get on with the business of fixing the problems created by the ones who did the lying and the ones who REPEATED THE LIES endlessly?

Is there something we, the people who know the truth, can do to help our friends and neighbors and loved ones and fellow citizens to focus the shame and anger and frustration they will feel about having believed the lies and the massive surge of energy these feelings will unleash, towards repairing the damage?

Because, if we don't, it's likely that many of these people will use this energy to cling even more tightly to the lies because to let go of them will mean admitting they were mistaken, and we have become a nation of people who are often unwilling or unable to admit the things we have screwed-up.

Tuesday, March 18, 2008

Andrew Sullivan Loves The Speech


(This was a world-class speech. Support whichever candidate you want to, but at least admit that this was an amazing speech. And if you can not admit that...please ask yourself why. mark.)


The Speech
18 Mar 2008 11:32 am
Andrew Sullivan

Alas, I cannot give a more considered response right now as I have to get on the road. But I do want to say that this searing, nuanced, gut-wrenching, loyal, and deeply, deeply Christian speech is the most honest speech on race in America in my adult lifetime. It is a speech we have all been waiting for for a generation. Its ability to embrace both the legitimate fears and resentments of whites and the understandable anger and dashed hopes of many blacks was, in my view, unique in recent American history.

And it was a reflection of faith - deep, hopeful, transcending faith in the promises of the Gospels. And it was about America - its unique promise, its historic purpose, and our duty to take up the burden to perfect this union - today, in our time, in our way.

I have never felt more convinced that this man's candidacy - not this man, his candidacy - and what he can bring us to achieve - is an historic opportunity. This was a testing; and he did not merely pass it by uttering safe bromides. He addressed the intimate, painful love he has for an imperfect and sometimes embittered man. And how that love enables him to see that man's faults and pain as well as his promise. This is what my faith is about. It is what the Gospels are about. This is a candidate who does not merely speak as a Christian. He acts like a Christian.


Bill Clinton once said that everything bad in America can be rectified by what is good in America. He was right - and...

Sunday, March 16, 2008

Thoughts on Hillary haters and disproportionate responses






The last post was an excerpt from a piece my great friend Robert sent to me. If you haven’t read it, you might want to. It’s called “Hating Hillary: Getting to the bottom of a cultural trend that has seeped into the church.”

I've been struggling with the severe adverse reactions I've been experiencing each time I get a dose of the Hillary Clinton campaign.

BUT, they say correlation does not equal causation and I am aware of the possibility that the headaches, dizziness, nausea, dry mouth, clenched fists, throbbing temple-veins, gritted teeth, labored breathing, and non-specific rage I exhibit whenever the Clinton is administered might very well not be symptoms that are actually brought about by the active ingredients in the Clinton itself any more than a Post Traumatic Stress Disordered freakout is caused by the rude customer service rep or the contemptuous civil servant. The person on the other end of the altercation may activate the rage and frustration and feelings of powerlessness, but they didn't create them, so the reaction often seems to be (and is) way out of proportion with the actual events as they are unfolding.

For example: I am, let's say, 10 years old and my step-father mocks, belittles and abuses me on a regular basis and no adult seems willing to intervene on my behalf. It is unfair, but there is little I can do about it, so I go to school and suck it up as best I can, knowing at the very least, that school is a place where things are more fair than home. So far, so good.

Then at lunch an older kid, a bully from a grade or two ahead of mine, cuts in front of me in the lunch line. I seethe. I tell the adult lunch-monitor, appealing for justice. I am dismissed, ignored, denied the fair play that has allowed me to keep my anger in check. So, I go back to the line, and one thing leads to another, the bully tells me to piss off, shoving me as a warning to shut up and accept the passive ruling of the kids around us who would rather swallow the injustice and eat a bit later than stand up against this kind of behavior and risk reprisals. After I am pushed, in what is, I must admit, a fairly gentle manner, I flip out and react in a way that can best be described as "non-proportional." Perhaps I grab the fabric of the bully's shirt and throw him out of line, or I take a running start and tackle him or, perhaps, I pick up a hard plastic chair with metal legs and I threaten to throw it at him... Or, maybe I just begin to verbally assault him at the top of my lungs, screaming every curse word I have learned in my young life, pouring out what seems like a thirty-year old reservoir of rage, tearing down his family for generations in either direction, threatening bodily harm of the type which we all know I am entirely incapable of inflicting, realizing I am beginning to shriek as the tears literally pour from my eyes and noticing that there is now an ever-widening circle forming around me as I become a sort of reverse emotional whirlpool and the line compresses itself away from me on both sides and in the few seconds before I am hustled away to the office of some poor, lunchless administrator, I realize that nobody in that vast cafetorium would agree that the sky is blue if I were the one to suggest it. When I am finally escorted from the lunch area, it almost comes as a relief, considering my lack of an exit strategy, my inability to end the sketch.

Hillary isn’t the bully. She isn’t even the negligent lunchroom monitor. She might be one of the other kids on the lunch line, I don’t know. I’m not exactly sure where or if she fits into that tale at all. (But I’m pretty sure the recent Republican administrations are the stepfather who has been abusing us for years…) The point (yes, please…what is this point of which you speak?) seems to be that for me, as I suspect it is for many of us, Hillary Clinton and her campaign, to varying degrees, somehow have morphed into symbols of all injustice, timidity, sad compromise, petty nastiness, duplicity, and even evil. This is neither helpful nor accurate and I think, for me, the first step towards defusing this misguided rage is the attempt to remember that, contrary to some of the evidence (real and ridiculous), Hillary is neither a monster nor a witch; she is a human being. And if she is a human being who, like her campaign and her surrogates and many of her supporters, seems to be in a perpetual defensive crouch, I need to take responsibility for my part in that. How to do that…I’ve not yet figured out.

Or maybe Hillary is just that close relative with whom you have a history of fights and reconciliations and each time you find yourselves in a new dispute, you have to deal with the baggage you have accumulated over years of only temporarily resolved conflict. Perhaps, you tell yourself each time you feel a disagreement a-brewin’, this will be the fight that makes her finally see the fundamental flaw in her philosophy and you will finally, finally, be able to bury the hatchet and move forward with a newfound sense of camaraderie and cooperation. Then she opens her mouth and you are buried up to your neck in steamer trunks and you respond by vomiting out a roomful of backpacks and duffel bags and, once again, you find yourselves drowning in a sea of baggage.

This post is FAR too long and if you have read this far, I would like to marry you.

Christianity Today speaks and this Jew listens



Hating Hillary

Getting to the bottom of a cultural trend that has seeped into the church.

A Christianity Today editorial | posted 3/03/2008 09:40AM

(quote from the conclusion of the article)

But when vigorous political discourse turns into bashing of public figures, it perpetuates a great lie: that they are merely the ideologies and symbols attached to them. When a candidate's ideology is mistaken for his or her personhood, it masks a crucial truth: that each person, no matter their political views, bears God's image and matters deeply to him.

While pundits see candidates as punching bags, evangelicals are supposed to see candidates as, well, people. As we ponder how candidates are "fearfully and wonderfully made," we may haltingly come to realize that the most bold and courageous thing we each could do this election season, no matter who we vote for, is this: Love Hillary.






Wednesday, March 05, 2008

The Ohio primary doesn't pick our Presidents


Just a lil reality check

A few other Democrats went on to win the presidency after they lost the Ohio primary.

JFK, for instance.
oh, and a guy we like to call FDR.
as well as Woodrow Wilson.

So, I'd say we're in pretty good company, wouldn't you?



http://blog.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2008/03/clinton_stumbles_on_ohio_histo.html

HILLARY - The Low Hope Leader


Hillary Clinton’s new “scary” ad


Bill Clinton talking about hope vs. fear

(a.k.a. BILL CLINTON ENDORSES BARACK OBAMA)


Now watch Hillary's campaign twist itself into a pretzel to convince us that her new ad isn't about scaring people, it's about encouraging them to hope...

...TO HOPE THAT OBAMA DOESN'T WIN BECAUSE THEN WE'LL ALL DIE BECAUSE HE'S FUNCTIONALLY RETARDED AND CAN'T UNDERSTAND HOW TO WORK A PHONE!!!!!!!!!!!!! AHHHHHHHHH!!!!! BE HOPEFUL!!!!! EEEEEEK!

WHO'S GOING TO PROTECT YOUR CHILDREN FROM THE 3AM BAD PEOPLE!!!!!! SHRIEK!!!! hILLARY WEARS GLASSES AND ANSWERS THE PHONE HERSELF!

obama would have PEOPLE to answer the phone for him!!!!!

And he's a real heavy sleeper!!!!

Hillary sleeps very lightly and has cat-like reflexes!!!!

When the 3am terrorists call, HILLARY WILL TALK TO THEM! (unless they're from Iran, then she'll screen her calls...)

OMIGOD! AAAAAH! I'M SO HOPEFUL I THINK I JUST PEED MYSELF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Vote Hillary - The Low Hope Leader